7/3/2023 0 Comments Disadvantages of bouml![]() Current version is only testing as I cannot guarantee that it works correctly. If all goes well the fork should be stable and have some improvements by the beginning of April. The way I see it - this fork will fix Bruno's rather questionable UI decisions that made workflow kinda similar to operating meat grinder.(too much circular mouse movement) (there are probably ones I have not found yet) This fork has been pretty much dead for a year but I have picked it up at the end of February and by now () I have fixed almost all porting errors. The original may have gone closed-source but we have an(almost) working open source Qt4 fork at : Regards, Comte0 ( talk) 14:48, 17 October 2011 (UTC) Reply As for Gentoo, they moved on to KDE4, which the author refused to support one year before this mess. Daniel Santos ( talk) 09:21, 16 October 2011 (UTC) Reply I don't dispute that, however wikipedia abide by Reliable Sources, and those were hard to find (see the RS noticeboard above). ![]() Also, as far as the contested "widely used in universities" statement, I understand wanting an encyclopedia to be accurate, but any software engineering tool of this quality (and no, it's not perfect) that can be obtained on a "student's budget" (if you will) and in a market where there are so few products at it's price that are up to snuff, I think you can rest assured that it is "widely used" if by widely, you mean by at least 20% of universities. ![]() :( It was recently removed from the Gentoo repository, I presume because of lack of maintenance, I'm not really sure. BOUML is one of the few open source UML editors that we have and so many of them are so buggy. I've seen pages on software of far lessor importance. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.Reliable sources were discussed at Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_84#BOUML Comte0 ( talk) 19:52, 9 January 2011 (UTC) Reply Wow, sucks to have all this ado over deleting a page about this software. Not suitable for all types of problems: There are problems that lend themselves well to functional-programming style, logic-programming style, or procedure-based programming style, and applying object-oriented programming in those situations will not result in efficient programs.Slower programs: Object-oriented programs are typically slower than procedure-based programs, as they typically require more instructions to be executed.Larger program size: Object-oriented programs typically involve more lines of code than procedural programs.Some of the key programming techniques, such as inheritance and polymorphism, can be challenging to comprehend initially. It is complex to create programs based on interaction of objects. Steep learning curve: The thought process involved in object-oriented programming may not be natural for some people, and it can take time to get used to it. ![]() Some of the disadvantages of object-oriented programming include: Although quality is dependent upon the experience of the teams, object-oriented programming tends to result in higher-quality software. Higher-quality software: Faster development of software and lower cost of development allows more time and resources to be used in the verification of the software.Typically, more effort is put into the object-oriented analysis and design, which lowers the overall cost of development. Lower cost of development: The reuse of software also lowers the cost of development.Object-oriented programming languages come with rich libraries of objects, and code developed during projects is also reusable in future projects. Faster development: Reuse enables faster development. ![]() Since the design is modular, part of the system can be updated in case of issues without a need to make large-scale changes.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |